Sunday, March 1, 2009

Laura: Beddin(g)stallation

Temporary installation, Alda's café
Feb 18th 2009
Inter collective

As Claire outlined in a previous post after many a weeks in discussion, brainstorming and researching a laneway project an opportunity arose itself for the Inter Collective to install a work for a function for the Planning Institute of Australia at Alda's café which is tucked away in Wolf Lane. Although having been targeted by urban and Laneway activation programs we had previously dismissed Wolf Lane as a site for us due to it already being an activated space. Sitting in the lane discussing ideas we where surprised at what a huge thoroughfare for pedestrian traffic Wolf Lane is, the majority of which are full time workers not keen for there journey to be disrupted or inconvenienced in any manner (as Claire and Anna experienced when the lane was closed off for a Tony & Guy function). Alas we saw the opportunity to get some physical work happening, testing out some ideas and getting some feedback from an audience of people who are working towards activating urban sites and as there tagline goes ‘creating sustainable communities’.

We had been tossing around the idea of using mattresses for quite some time now, softening the space if you like and inviting the viewer to sit or lie and hence offering an alternate way of using and seeing the space. During our residency Site Fiction at the Arcane bookshop last year we found covering a space in a particular material allows a viewer to have a different experience of a space they have often become so accustomed to. Through covering, papering or wrapping the form and physicality of a space becomes more evident creating a new engagement with a site that users may have unconsciously become detached from.

Anyway after a week long debacle of trying to accumulate enough mattresses to fill the dimensions of the alfresco area we spent the day crazily sewing covers before loading them into the van and setting out to Alda's. Arriving a little behind schedule we get to work piling the mattresses in the centre of the area moving around tables, chairs and the few remaining patrons. After lining the floor with the mattresses (perfectly fitting the area) we set tearing strips of sheets which we then start wrapping basically around anything we can get to in the space; trees, chairs, planter boxes.


All in all (given the time, budget and site restrictions) I felt that we managed to create an interesting environment people would not be expecting yet remained accessible even if simply on an aesthetic level and invited interaction. Well, in summary a few patrons ventured outside with a glass of wine or a cigarette to make use of the space however it become all too frequency someone stumbled into the space looking hesitant made a nervous comment about ‘a sleepover’ before hurrying over the mattresses to safe ground and continuing on with their evening.

Perhaps it was the wrong audience for this kind of work but it was hard to shake the feeling that no matter what we could have done the majority of people who experienced the work where either simply not interested, struggled to take us seriously as artists or felt confronted and uncomfortable with a work that was geared at trying to achieve the exact opposite effect.
Anyway thought I’d post some photos of the work – we would love some feedback and comments and that is mainly what the night was lacking for us.
Is there an audience for this kind of work in Perth?

Comments (30)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
Did people actually lie down on the mattresses?

The thing I always find the most fascinating when lying down in unusual places is the way that the sounds change. Perhaps it's your closer proximity to the ground... I don't know, tee physics was a long time ago.

Anyway, the change in sound, the greater volume of space above your head and the obscured periphery vision by lying on your back in a public space does take me to a different world in a strange way. The thought of other people staring at you on the ground would probably also alter your emotions and effect your experience.
Reply
yeah! you make a good point. in fact, one of our next projects is hopefully going to address this exact idea. i think, particularly in open public spaces where one is relatively familiar (ie, has been there before, several times even), it is really interesting how your experience of that space can be completely altered by the simplest thing (like lying down, looking up, closing your eyes...), and your awareness is dramatically shifted. different senses become more dominant or apparent, and you really understand the space in a new way. i've recently become really aware of how much detail i just don't pay attention to in places that are really familiar to me, generally speaking, Perth. I wonder how many other people are the same as me.
Reply
I had a cool drunken argument with a beautiful woman once about how lying on your side on the couch and watching tv effects the way you absorb what's going on. I find it can really disorientate me at first, its not until my brain adjusts to looking at things at 90 degrees difference to norm that I could follow the tv show I'm watching properly. She did not agree with me at all, so its possible that I'm weird. Almost needless to say, that conversation was the end of a very brief relationship.
Reply
1 reply · active 834 weeks ago
you're right! i dont even know if i can actually ever adjust to proper orientated-viewing when i lie on my side. that's totally right.

anyway, the point is, nobody really lay down except for us when we finished wrapping everything because we were exhausted. so we enjoyed it!

but how can we get people to lie down? and why wont they just? is it just a matter of finding the right audience, and if so, who is that audience, and why should it be such a selective thing? doesn't everybody like to lie down eventually? isn't it natural? are we wrong in thinking this???
Reply
I think the actual act of lying down would certainly be confronting for people who aren't used to engaging in spaces, especially public ones, in that way. I don't think that you should be measuring your success in how many people did lie down though, the artwork may have affected their perceptions rather than their actions, and that may be something that's not immediately obvious to you guys as artists.. especially since you do already feel comfortable stepping outside the norm and have probably learnt that in a very open and supportive environment...
Reply
You bring up a very interesting point Emma. It is a huge step to be able to alter peoples actions within a space, particularly a public space, and perhaps through merely exposing them to such a work has already opened them up to a new kind of awareness- even visually. Maybe they came back a few days later and found themselves looking for a work which no longer existed instead they see a familiar space in a different way.
I myself find it difficult when confronted with a work, I remember seeing Carsten Hollers work The Unilever Series at the Tate Modern (http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/carsten... and the huge step it took for me to push past my normal gallery etiquette of lone, pensive patron and get myself to interact with the work. It has only been recently through working with the inter collective that I have learnt through taking this step I am opening myself up to a whole new level of experience and consciousness.
Reply
I feel the work we do as the inter collective is geared towards creating an interesting and comfortable environment, removed from the elitism of contemporary art which a varied audience can access on a multitude of levels. Be it physically, visually or even subconsciously. It just becomes grinding on our end when people fail to tell us their response to the work.
Reply
1 reply · active 817 weeks ago
Here is a response: its not art. The void between people being creative and *trying* to be creative is vast. You all fall into that void.
Reply
Hey Laura, congratulations on getting picked up for New Works New Faces!
Reply
Holy shit. This is the biggest load of rubbish I have ever seen.

"struggled to take us seriously as artists"

Is that surprising? All you did was dump your filthy sheets on the floor and then expected people (who had probably dressed up for the occasion) to sit on the floor with you.

Let me make this very clear; This is not art - it is just some lazy kids who would rather act as if what they are doing is so high brow that no one else gets it rather than getting a job. You aren't making a difference, your 'art' is childish and there will never be an audience for this (except maybe in Melbourne where people like you all hang out and slap each other on the back)

P.S. your spelling is terrible (their/there).
Reply
16 replies · active 817 weeks ago
Lulzbot,

The very moment that you read this and decided to take the time to respond to this post reinforced in concrete that this is art.
Reply
Does that make my previous post art?
Reply
no just naive art criticism u useless troll
Reply
Nice sock puppet
Reply
If you work hard at it, you may be on to something.
Reply
So who put a 25 year old who lives with his mother in charge of what is, and what isn't, art? By the way, listing 'Apple' as one of your interests doesn't make you creative.
Reply
It depends who you talk to, some would say it was the Big Bang, others might say God. It's just a fact and you should bow to my authority.

Oh, and I don't think I ever made a claim that by listing an interest of mine as 'Apple' meant that I was creative.
Reply
You might not have made the claim but you certainly hoped people would think of you as 'creative' by listing Apple as interest.
Reply
How do the two correlate? I would be interested to hear your thoughts.
Reply
Ok

Apple market their products in a certain way. They make the viewer think that if they are creative they need a mac to realise that potential. Sheep like you who think they are creative buy into the advertising associated with having a macbook and using it at a coffee shop. The fact is that you could have paid half the price for a Dell and it would still do everything you use it for (email and wanking to shota).
Reply
I don't think its any worse than the way Dell market their products. At least after you buy your Mac you can get as much shota as you want without having to worry about whether Vista will support legacy printer drivers for when you want to print out your collection. The chance of you getting a virus from your favourite fetish torrents is also significantly lower.

The Apple products are just far better value, whether you are creative or not.
Reply
Who mentioned Vista?

The illusion of security in OSX is a fallacy.

How does paying more for inferior hardware make it better value?
Reply
It doesn't matter how high the hardware specifications are, if the experience of actually trying to use those features is bad, then all value added by those specs are lost.

I don't know about you personally, but I judge value by the experience I have with a product. Mcdonalds burgers are cheaper but I prefer paying a little extra to get a burger from my local burger shop with ingredients that aren't all manufactured for the pure purpose of being cheaper.
Reply
Well then you are a lolcow. Macs have the same parts inside them as other computers.
Reply
Oh dear... I just broke your mind, didn't I?

You've being living in a world where specs mean everything. Girls with bigger breasts are better than those with better personalities, cars with bigger engines are better than those with better mileage. Is your world now falling apart?

Welcome to the real world lulzbot. I hope you learned something today.
Reply
Girls with bigger breasts are better than girls with personality.
Reply
I've written about this entire 'discussion' on a more recent blog post

http://intercollective.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/o...

we feel it's important keep it open but directed at what we're actually doing, so PLEASE continue your comments there...
Reply
3 replies · active 817 weeks ago
Don't stifle my creativity - I want to post here.
Reply
Vote down and delete! I luv troll baiting ... they so srs!!

/b/ lol not
Reply
Why do you hate Buddhists? You wouldn't know a troll if it took your lunch.
Reply

Comments by